Loading
Loading
Case Studies
Approved evidence from an AI Production Studio for Fashion, with production ownership from source input to reviewed delivery.
Each case study follows one production route from source input to reviewed delivery. We publish only evidence that has been reviewed and approved in our evidence registry, so client names, volumes and feedback appear exactly as approved. When a client is confidential, the programme is described without naming the brand.
Each case study page names who reviewed the evidence and when. The rules behind this are set out in our editorial and public claims policy.
They show studio-operated AI production at catalogue volume, not one-off demo images. The confidential programme covers AI head swap as catalogue production. The second story covers Studio 11, a photo studio in Bangalore, where 8M set up a deployed workflow that handles 8,000+ images a month. Both follow the work from input through review to output.
If you are weighing a similar route, the AI head swap page explains the service, and AI catalogue production covers managed catalogue work. To review AI output on your own catalogue, use the AI fashion imagery QC checklist, and measure your first-pass acceptance rate on your hardest SKUs before you scale.
Production story
Studio 11, a photo studio in Bangalore, provides the inputs for this production workflow.
8M set up a deployed production workflow that Studio 11 operates in-house.
The workflow handles 8,000+ images a month.
The solution page for this setup is Custom AI Production Systems.
Review is part of that deployed production workflow.
The output is about 100,000 images over the last four months.
Studio 11 told us their brand clients said the AI images looked more natural than some of their human-shot images.
AI fashion production
Start with the production route that fits the outcome, then scope a paid pilot or workflow audit.